Archiv für den Autor: Andreas

Bing tests showing favicons in Shopping ad results

favicons in Shopping ad results-1

Bing is testing favicons within its Shopping ad results. Previously, Bing only showed the site name without a favicon, but now we’re spotting favicons appearing alongside these results.

This mirrors a similar change we recently covered on Google, where favicons started appearing in Shopping ad results after previously showing only the website name.

Here is screenshot with favicons.

favicons in Shopping ad results

Here is a screenshot without a favicon.

without favicons in Shopping ad results

Showing favicons within Shopping ad results is a solid addition, helping build trust with users by making it easier to quickly recognize a familiar brand before clicking.

The post Bing tests showing favicons in Shopping ad results appeared first on Search Engine Watch.

Source:: searchenginewatch.com

Google AI Mode now showing more organic products for ecommerce queries

Google AI Mode appears to be showing more organic products for ecommerce queries. Previously, searching the same keyword in AI Mode returned fewer product suggestions, but in recent days, AI Mode has been showing more product carousels within its results.

Here is a video I took today.

Showing more organic products is a positive shift for site owners relying on organic visibility. This also ties into another recent test we covered, where Google was mixing sponsored and organic products together within AI Mode.

The post Google AI Mode now showing more organic products for ecommerce queries appeared first on Search Engine Watch.

Source:: searchenginewatch.com

Google tests another new loading animation for sponsored results

loading animation for sponsored results

Google is testing another new loading animation for sponsored results. We previously covered a different loading animation where Google showed logos while ads loaded, but today we spotted yet another variation. In this version, when a user searches for something, the sponsored results load using an animation similar to how AI Overview results load.

Here is a screenshot.

Have you seen this new loading animation for sponsored results in your own searches?

The post Google tests another new loading animation for sponsored results appeared first on Search Engine Watch.

Source:: searchenginewatch.com

Google Free Listings now shows Visit site button in product grid

Free Listings now shows Visit site button

Google Free Listings has made another change recently. We previously spotted the blue “More” label carousel, and today we’re seeing another update the free listing grid now shows a “Visit site” button alongside the price and website name. This looks new to us, with both the website name and the “Visit site” button being clickable. Below this, Google shows sponsored results, followed by all stores.

Here is a screenshot of how it looks.

free listing products

gogle free listing-1

Adding a “Visit site” button is a solid update, since it gives users a clear, direct action right within the product listing, which could help increase CTR for the websites featured there.

The post Google Free Listings now shows Visit site button in product grid appeared first on Search Engine Watch.

Source:: searchenginewatch.com

Wikipedia plans to test Google Preferred Sources as search traffic falls

Wikipedia is preparing an experiment with Google Preferred Sources as it deals with a steady decline in traffic coming from Google.

The idea is simple: when someone arrives at Wikipedia from Google on a mobile device, Wikipedia would show them a small notice asking them to add the site as a Preferred Source.

Then Wikipedia will see whether they come back more often.

The experiment has not started yet. Wikimedia’s Future Audiences team says it wants to run the test in late September or early October, initially for about two weeks.

There is a fairly obvious reason for the timing.

In the proposal, Wikimedia Foundation product lead Maryana Pinchuk said Wikipedia received about 138 million fewer clickthroughs from Google during the last week of August and first week of September compared with the same period last year.

That works out to a 17% year-over-year decline for that comparison period. Around 75% of Wikipedia reading sessions historically start with a search engine, and roughly 90% of those search sessions come from Google.

So Wikipedia is going to ask Google for help dealing with less Google traffic. Sort of.

Preferred Sources becomes a retention tool

Google Preferred Sources lets signed-in users tell Google which websites they want to see more often.

Google originally launched the feature around Top Stories, but has since expanded Preferred Sources into AI Overviews and AI Mode, where selected sites can receive a Preferred Source label.

Google says people are twice as likely to click through to a site after selecting it as a Preferred Source. In August, Google also released a button publishers can place directly on their own websites to make the process easier. More than 600,000 unique sources had been selected by users at that point.

Wikipedia wants to find out whether that translates into something more useful than a nice badge.

The proposed test would split logged-out mobile visitors arriving from Google into treatment and control groups. One group would see the Preferred Sources prompt. The other would see Wikipedia as usual.

Wikimedia plans to measure pageviews per user, click-through rate on the prompt and, more loosely, AI Overview impressions. Its Phabricator documentation describes the goal as testing whether the CTA increases pageviews generated by those users.

That makes this more interesting for publishers than another button Google would like them to install.

Wikipedia is effectively testing whether publishers can use the Google traffic they still receive to create a preference that helps generate more Google traffic later.

AI Overviews are part of the backdrop

Separately, Wikimedia’s September research newsletter highlighted a University of Washington preprint estimating that Google’s rollout of AI Overviews reduced external search referrals to English Wikipedia by roughly 4.8% to 5.5%, depending on the comparison group used.

That figure should not be confused with Wikipedia’s recent 17% year-over-year Google referral decline.

The study looks specifically at the estimated effect of AI Overviews using 2024 data and a statistical comparison between language editions. The 17% figure is a direct year-over-year comparison for a recent period and could reflect several changes in Google Search, user behavior and demand.

The preprint has also changed considerably during development. Earlier versions estimated a much larger effect before the researchers changed both their methodology and data source. It has not yet been peer reviewed.

Wikipedia’s experiment may give publishers something more immediately useful: an actual test of whether Preferred Sources can bring readers back.

If it works, expect that little “add us as a Preferred Source” button to become considerably harder to avoid.

The post Wikipedia plans to test Google Preferred Sources as search traffic falls appeared first on Search Engine Watch.

Source:: searchenginewatch.com